n-grammes en python, quatre, cinq, six grammes?

je suis surpris que cela ne soit pas encore apparu:

In [34]: sentence = "I really like python, it's pretty awesome.".split()

In [35]: N = 4

In [36]: grams = [sentence[i:i+N] for i in xrange(len(sentence)-N+1)]

In [37]: for gram in grams: print gram
['I', 'really', 'like', 'python,']
['really', 'like', 'python,', "it's"]
['like', 'python,', "it's", 'pretty']
['python,', "it's", 'pretty', 'awesome.']

voici un autre moyen simple pour do n-grammes

>>> from nltk.util import ngrams
>>> text = "I am aware that nltk only offers bigrams and trigrams, but is there a way to split my text in four-grams, five-grams or even hundred-grams"
>>> tokenize = nltk.word_tokenize(text)
>>> tokenize
['I', 'am', 'aware', 'that', 'nltk', 'only', 'offers', 'bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams', ',', 'but', 'is', 'there', 'a', 'way', 'to', 'split', 'my', 'text', 'in', 'four-grams', ',', 'five-grams', 'or', 'even', 'hundred-grams']
>>> bigrams = ngrams(tokenize,2)
>>> bigrams
[('I', 'am'), ('am', 'aware'), ('aware', 'that'), ('that', 'nltk'), ('nltk', 'only'), ('only', 'offers'), ('offers', 'bigrams'), ('bigrams', 'and'), ('and', 'trigrams'), ('trigrams', ','), (',', 'but'), ('but', 'is'), ('is', 'there'), ('there', 'a'), ('a', 'way'), ('way', 'to'), ('to', 'split'), ('split', 'my'), ('my', 'text'), ('text', 'in'), ('in', 'four-grams'), ('four-grams', ','), (',', 'five-grams'), ('five-grams', 'or'), ('or', 'even'), ('even', 'hundred-grams')]
>>> trigrams=ngrams(tokenize,3)
>>> trigrams
[('I', 'am', 'aware'), ('am', 'aware', 'that'), ('aware', 'that', 'nltk'), ('that', 'nltk', 'only'), ('nltk', 'only', 'offers'), ('only', 'offers', 'bigrams'), ('offers', 'bigrams', 'and'), ('bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams'), ('and', 'trigrams', ','), ('trigrams', ',', 'but'), (',', 'but', 'is'), ('but', 'is', 'there'), ('is', 'there', 'a'), ('there', 'a', 'way'), ('a', 'way', 'to'), ('way', 'to', 'split'), ('to', 'split', 'my'), ('split', 'my', 'text'), ('my', 'text', 'in'), ('text', 'in', 'four-grams'), ('in', 'four-grams', ','), ('four-grams', ',', 'five-grams'), (',', 'five-grams', 'or'), ('five-grams', 'or', 'even'), ('or', 'even', 'hundred-grams')]
>>> fourgrams=ngrams(tokenize,4)
>>> fourgrams
[('I', 'am', 'aware', 'that'), ('am', 'aware', 'that', 'nltk'), ('aware', 'that', 'nltk', 'only'), ('that', 'nltk', 'only', 'offers'), ('nltk', 'only', 'offers', 'bigrams'), ('only', 'offers', 'bigrams', 'and'), ('offers', 'bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams'), ('bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams', ','), ('and', 'trigrams', ',', 'but'), ('trigrams', ',', 'but', 'is'), (',', 'but', 'is', 'there'), ('but', 'is', 'there', 'a'), ('is', 'there', 'a', 'way'), ('there', 'a', 'way', 'to'), ('a', 'way', 'to', 'split'), ('way', 'to', 'split', 'my'), ('to', 'split', 'my', 'text'), ('split', 'my', 'text', 'in'), ('my', 'text', 'in', 'four-grams'), ('text', 'in', 'four-grams', ','), ('in', 'four-grams', ',', 'five-grams'), ('four-grams', ',', 'five-grams', 'or'), (',', 'five-grams', 'or', 'even'), ('five-grams', 'or', 'even', 'hundred-grams')]

utilisant uniquement des outils nltk

from nltk.tokenize import word_tokenize
from nltk.util import ngrams

def get_ngrams(text, n ):
    n_grams = ngrams(word_tokenize(text), n)
    return [ ' '.join(grams) for grams in n_grams]

exemple de sortie

get_ngrams('This is the simplest text i could think of', 3 )

['This is the', 'is the simplest', 'the simplest text', 'simplest text i', 'text i could', 'i could think', 'could think of']

pour conserver les ngrams au format array, il suffit de supprimer ' '.join

vous pouvez facilement créer votre propre fonction pour faire cela en utilisant itertools :

from itertools import izip, islice, tee
s = 'spam and eggs'
N = 3
trigrams = izip(*(islice(seq, index, None) for index, seq in enumerate(tee(s, N))))
list(trigrams)
# [('s', 'p', 'a'), ('p', 'a', 'm'), ('a', 'm', ' '),
# ('m', ' ', 'a'), (' ', 'a', 'n'), ('a', 'n', 'd'),
# ('n', 'd', ' '), ('d', ' ', 'e'), (' ', 'e', 'g'),
# ('e', 'g', 'g'), ('g', 'g', 's')]

Je n'ai jamais traité avec nltk, mais n-grammes dans le cadre d'un petit projet de classe. Si vous voulez trouver la fréquence de tous les N-grammes survenant dans la chaîne, voici une façon de le faire. D vous donnerait l'histogramme de vos N-mots.

D = dict()
string = 'whatever string...'
strparts = string.split()
for i in range(len(strparts)-N): # N-grams
    try:
        D[tuple(strparts[i:i+N])] += 1
    except:
        D[tuple(strparts[i:i+N])] = 1

pour four_grams il est déjà dans NLTK , voici un morceau de code qui peut vous aider à ce sujet:

 from nltk.collocations import *
 import nltk
 #You should tokenize your text
 text = "I do not like green eggs and ham, I do not like them Sam I am!"
 tokens = nltk.wordpunct_tokenize(text)
 fourgrams=nltk.collocations.QuadgramCollocationFinder.from_words(tokens)
 for fourgram, freq in fourgrams.ngram_fd.items():  
       print fourgram, freq

j'espère que ça aidera.

une approche plus élégante pour construire des bigrammes avec le builtin de python zip() . Il suffit de convertir la chaîne originale en une liste par split() , puis passer la liste une fois normalement et une fois offset par un élément.

string = "I really like python, it's pretty awesome."

def find_bigrams(s):
    input_list = s.split(" ")
    return zip(input_list, input_list[1:])

def find_ngrams(s, n):
  input_list = s.split(" ")
  return zip(*[input_list[i:] for i in range(n)])

find_bigrams(string)

[('I', 'really'), ('really', 'like'), ('like', 'python,'), ('python,', "it's"), ("it's", 'pretty'), ('pretty', 'awesome.')]

vous pouvez utiliser sklearn.feature_extraction.texte.CountVectorizer :

import sklearn.feature_extraction.text # FYI http://scikit-learn.org/stable/install.html
ngram_size = 4
string = ["I really like python, it's pretty awesome."]
vect = sklearn.feature_extraction.text.CountVectorizer(ngram_range=(ngram_size,ngram_size))
vect.fit(string)
print('{1}-grams: {0}'.format(vect.get_feature_names(), ngram_size))

sorties:

4-grams: [u'like python it pretty', u'python it pretty awesome', u'really like python it']

vous pouvez définir ngram_size à n'importe quel entier positif. I. e. vous pouvez diviser un texte en quatre grammes, cinq grammes ou même centaines de grammes.

Nltk est grande, mais est parfois une surcharge pour certains projets:

import re
def tokenize(text, ngrams=1):
    text = re.sub(r'[\b\(\)\\"\'\/\[\]\s+\,\.:\?;]', ' ', text)
    text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text)
    tokens = text.split()
    return [tuple(tokens[i:i+ngrams]) for i in xrange(len(tokens)-ngrams+1)]

exemple d'utilisation:

>> text = "This is an example text"
>> tokenize(text, 2)
[('This', 'is'), ('is', 'an'), ('an', 'example'), ('example', 'text')]
>> tokenize(text, 3)
[('This', 'is', 'an'), ('is', 'an', 'example'), ('an', 'example', 'text')]

si l'efficacité est un problème et que vous devez construire plusieurs n-grammes différents (jusqu'à une centaine comme vous dites), mais que vous voulez utiliser du python pur, je le ferais:

from itertools import chain

def n_grams(seq, n=1):
    """Returns an itirator over the n-grams given a listTokens"""
    shiftToken = lambda i: (el for j,el in enumerate(seq) if j>=i)
    shiftedTokens = (shiftToken(i) for i in range(n))
    tupleNGrams = zip(*shiftedTokens)
    return tupleNGrams # if join in generator : (" ".join(i) for i in tupleNGrams)

def range_ngrams(listTokens, ngramRange=(1,2)):
    """Returns an itirator over all n-grams for n in range(ngramRange) given a listTokens."""
    return chain(*(n_grams(listTokens, i) for i in range(*ngramRange)))

Utilisation :

>>> input_list = input_list = 'test the ngrams generator'.split()
>>> list(range_ngrams(input_list, ngramRange=(1,3)))
[('test',), ('the',), ('ngrams',), ('generator',), ('test', 'the'), ('the', 'ngrams'), ('ngrams', 'generator'), ('test', 'the', 'ngrams'), ('the', 'ngrams', 'generator')]

~même vitesse que NLTK:

import nltk
%%timeit
input_list = 'test the ngrams interator vs nltk '*10**6
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=5)
# 7.02 ms ± 79 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

%%timeit
input_list = 'test the ngrams interator vs nltk '*10**6
n_grams(input_list,n=5)
# 7.01 ms ± 103 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

%%timeit
input_list = 'test the ngrams interator vs nltk '*10**6
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=1)
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=2)
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=3)
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=4)
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=5)
# 7.32 ms ± 241 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

%%timeit
input_list = 'test the ngrams interator vs nltk '*10**6
range_ngrams(input_list, ngramRange=(1,6))
# 7.13 ms ± 165 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

Repost de mon réponse précédente .

vous pouvez obtenir tous les 4-6gram en utilisant le code sans autre paquet ci-dessous:

from itertools import chain

def get_m_2_ngrams(input_list, min, max):
    for s in chain(*[get_ngrams(input_list, k) for k in range(min, max+1)]):
        yield ' '.join(s)

def get_ngrams(input_list, n):
    return zip(*[input_list[i:] for i in range(n)])

if __name__ == '__main__':
    input_list = ['I', 'am', 'aware', 'that', 'nltk', 'only', 'offers', 'bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams', ',', 'but', 'is', 'there', 'a', 'way', 'to', 'split', 'my', 'text', 'in', 'four-grams', ',', 'five-grams', 'or', 'even', 'hundred-grams']
    for s in get_m_2_ngrams(input_list, 4, 6):
        print(s)

la sortie est ci-dessous:

I am aware that
am aware that nltk
aware that nltk only
that nltk only offers
nltk only offers bigrams
only offers bigrams and
offers bigrams and trigrams
bigrams and trigrams ,
and trigrams , but
trigrams , but is
, but is there
but is there a
is there a way
there a way to
a way to split
way to split my
to split my text
split my text in
my text in four-grams
text in four-grams ,
in four-grams , five-grams
four-grams , five-grams or
, five-grams or even
five-grams or even hundred-grams
I am aware that nltk
am aware that nltk only
aware that nltk only offers
that nltk only offers bigrams
nltk only offers bigrams and
only offers bigrams and trigrams
offers bigrams and trigrams ,
bigrams and trigrams , but
and trigrams , but is
trigrams , but is there
, but is there a
but is there a way
is there a way to
there a way to split
a way to split my
way to split my text
to split my text in
split my text in four-grams
my text in four-grams ,
text in four-grams , five-grams
in four-grams , five-grams or
four-grams , five-grams or even
, five-grams or even hundred-grams
I am aware that nltk only
am aware that nltk only offers
aware that nltk only offers bigrams
that nltk only offers bigrams and
nltk only offers bigrams and trigrams
only offers bigrams and trigrams ,
offers bigrams and trigrams , but
bigrams and trigrams , but is
and trigrams , but is there
trigrams , but is there a
, but is there a way
but is there a way to
is there a way to split
there a way to split my
a way to split my text
way to split my text in
to split my text in four-grams
split my text in four-grams ,
my text in four-grams , five-grams
text in four-grams , five-grams or
in four-grams , five-grams or even
four-grams , five-grams or even hundred-grams

vous pouvez trouver plus de détails sur ce blog